Follow us
Learning to Learn - Differently
  • Home
  • What's the Difference?
  • 21st Century Governance
  • L2D2 Open Forum
  • Teaching and Learning
  • Resource Bank

What's the difference?

Thoughts on making a real difference in the lives of learners...

View all Blog Entries

The Politics of Testing

1/23/2015

3 Comments

 
Picture
Measuring student assessment should be an educational exercise, not a political one. When I see external agencies using test results to rank schools, or assess teacher performance, it is a clear example of a simplistic misunderstanding of the limitations of a single number as an indicator of the quality of a complex teaching and learning environment.
By the same token, I also bristle when I hear professional educators decry the use of some form of standardized testing or provincial exam as a means of benchmarking student performance and identifying areas for increased support and intervention. Both sides quite often forget that assessment is a tool for learning and not an end in itself.

Years ago, I was taking an additional qualification course in Special Education being offered by York University. A couple of weeks into the course I submitted my first assignment, which was subsequently returned the next class. In red ink at the top of the first page was a large “B+”. There were no other comments or notations on any other page of the paper. After class I went up to the instructor and asked what I could have done to have improved my essay to an “A”.  Her response was: “When a paper is worth an “A” it just jumps out at you, and yours didn’t jump out!” Needless to say, I took this valuable feedback to heart in all of my future assignments!

If you talk to teachers about marking student work, most of them will tell you that it is the least favourite part of their job. In many cases, evaluating student work is seen as a means to an end, and that end is having a spreadsheet full of numbers that can be synthesized into a “grade” on a published report. Consequently for many educators, at all levels, assessment of student understanding and mastery of the core knowledge and skills is the part of the teaching and learning process that gets the least time and attention. It is viewed as a necessary “evil”, is frequently viewed as drudgery, and is all too often done on the couch while watching television. Having said that, children, parents, and receiving schools, colleges and universities who are trying to gauge student ability and performance, depend upon the numbers generated by this process to give them an accurate picture. I once, briefly, had a teacher working for me who felt that if he simply gave all of his students high marks, he could avoid any questioning of his teaching or his students’ achievement. Besides giving little meaningful feedback, he also demonstrated the weak point of much student assessment – it is subjective, and it is disproportionately dependent upon the skill and professional integrity of individual teachers.

Assessment is a tricky thing. To be effective, it needs to be based on clearly articulated outcomes, valid methodology, and either criterion or rubric based evaluation tools.  It also needs to be validated against external standards or benchmarks to ensure that a student’s stated performance in one classroom or school is a dependable predictor of their future performance elsewhere. This external validity is of critical importance to not only to parents and students, but to educators as well. 

Recently in the media, there has been the re-emergence of the annual debate about British Columbia's FSA (Foundation Skills Assessment) testing for Grades 4 and 7. In many Districts, the BC Teachers' Federation has taken out ads encouraging parents to request that their children be exempted from writing them. These detractors decry the testing as a narrowly focused tool for school and teacher assessment and one that lacks generalized reliability. In a sense, they are correct. As a stand-alone measure, the FSA does not provide reliable, comparable school to school or classroom to classroom data. To see it as such is a misuse of the information.

On the other hand, as a snapshot of student performance and a measure of skill development in language arts and mathematics, standardized testing like the FSA or Canadian Test of Basic Skills (CTBS) or DIBELS such as we also use at KGMS is a critically important tool not just to look at how our children are doing, but to inform instruction and to benchmark school assessment standards. Over the next month, many of our students will be completing the FSA in Grades 4 and 7. It is our plan to use the resultant information to help us to measure their progress; to identify peaks and valleys in their performance; and, to help us to improve our own practice in order to more effectively meet their needs. Politics aside, standardized, norm-referenced testing can be a valuable tool for educators to track student growth, benchmark school-based assessments, and give a generalized snapshot of the extent to which the programme is supporting students in mastering learning outcomes that will prepare them for success in the next stage of their schooling.



As educators, our responsibility is to help our students demystify the testing process, reduce their anxiety in this and any future test-taking situations, and to encourage them to approach the process like any other new learning experience. We let them know that the stakes are low, but that the potential rewards, in terms of understanding how they learn, are tremendous!
In a school like ours, where everyone is on an individual education plan, the lines sometimes become blurred between achievement in terms of our programme expectations, and the norms outlined in provincial guidelines. This kind of external measure helps us to bridge that gap and ensure smoother transitions both ways for our students. And, in the final analysis, the more information that we have about our students, the better we can teach them. Standardized testing, like the FSAs, provides just another piece of the puzzle. It is our job to put it altogether for our kids.

3 Comments
Carol link
1/23/2015 10:04:08 am

Great article Jim. I can't stand the Fraser Institute and their school ranking rubbish but I also can't stand when teachers do not want the students to write standardized tests. Why does this data need to be handed over to the Fraser institute anyway? Maybe we should get progressive think tanks like the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives to prepare their own analysis.

Reply
Tracey Miller
2/7/2015 12:15:32 am

I really enjoyed reading this. I helped me understand the test system as I have to admit I find it all a bit baffling. I have often wondered what the point of all of them is. Thinking of them as part of a puzzle makes much more sense. Thank you

Reply
Tall Girls in Colorado link
3/17/2021 05:44:57 am

Great blog post.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    Dr. Jim Christopher is the Head of Kenneth Gordon Maplewood School and Maplewood Alternative High School in North Vancouver. A parent, author and long-time teacher, and educational administrator across Canada, he has been actively involved in the drive to differentiate learning experiences to meet the needs of all learners.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    February 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    September 2019
    April 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Categories

    All
    Education
    Homework
    Independent Schools
    Learning Disabilities

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.