Follow us
Learning to Learn - Differently
  • Home
  • What's the Difference?
  • Forward Focused School Leadership
  • L2D2 Open Forum
  • Teaching and Learning
  • Resource Bank

What's the difference?

Thoughts on making a real difference in the lives of learners...

View all Blog Entries

Grit is for Sandpaper: Redux

2/15/2016

2 Comments

 
Picture

Sunday I read a tweet online from an educator who was praising a speaker at the IDAOrlando conference that she was attending. The speaker, with apparent clarity and certainty, declared that "The number one thing that LD students need, is grit." Well, the comment did make me grit my teeth, if that was the intent! Grit, like the "growth vs fixed mindset" mantra, is just another truism in the current "blame the learner" approach to working with students with learning challenges.

With the best of intentions, teachers and theorists have placed the mindset burden on the backs of students who are already struggling because they learn differently than the system expects them to. And, if being told that they have a fixed mindset is not enough of a burden to place on learners, they follow it up by telling them that the reason that they are underachieving is because they lack "grit" or, as I read recently in another article dedicated to oversimplifying complex processes, they are short on "moxie"! More and more our classrooms and schools are sounding like something out of a Horatio Alger novel or a 1940s movie script.

In actual fact, most of our students have to have incredible perseverance just to get up and come to school every day and face another 6 or 7 hours where they feel like they just can't cut it. So, before you start putting up your "Paul Tough" posters and before you start copying cutesy "Growth Mindset" bulletin boards off of Pinterest, be sure that you know whom your real audience should be.

You see, I have seen the "gritless", and they are us!

It is we educators who often lack the “moxie” to break down the barriers to learning. It is telling that our provincial teachers' union is taking the issue “class composition” to the Supreme Court – basically saying – “get those kids out of my classroom, they are too difficult to teach!” Independent schools all too often do the same thing – we’re just a little more subtle, using phrases like “sorry but your child is not a mission appropriate candidate for our school” or the “it’s not you, it’s me” approach – “Unfortunately, we’re just not a good fit for your daughter/son”.

Instead of listening to the outside experts, perhaps we should be focusing our attention a little closer to home. Standard school jargon talks about the principle of “in loco parentis”, educators acting in the place of the parent – we use it in classroom management, on field trips, and even in how we approach discipline. But maybe we’ve got it all wrong.  
Maybe, if we educators really believed in the importance of in loco parentis, we could consider following a different kind of approach when working with our students. 
You see, parents are really the ones with “grit”. They are the ones with a growth mindset about their own child, they have so much “moxie” that we often berate them in the staff room for being too pushy, or of being “helicopter” parents.

So maybe a real solution for our students, and us, would be to take over their advocate role. In fact, what if we acted like parents rather than teachers? What difference would that make to help students to succeed? What if every school treated each child as if her or his success was critically important to us? What if we all actively searched for ways in which every student could learn effectively?  What if we showed the same grit and perseverance that parents do when they support and advocate for their child?

You see, in loco parentis is not actually a legal construct at all, it is a philosophy of teaching and learning. The more that schools and administrators and teachers become cheerleaders, coaches and advocates for children; rather than taking on the roles of judge, jury and executioner; the better the chance they have for success.
​

Clearly, it is not students who need “grit” or a “growth mindset”, it is us. We are the ones who all too often give up on some kids as being beyond our ability to teach, and move on to easier, more pliant targets. We are the ones who need to use our professional grit to sand away the rough surfaces of insecurity and fear of failure and to expose and polish the underlying core of self-worth. The sooner we cease deflecting our professional responsibilities by blaming the learner for her or his lack of “moxie” – the sooner we can actually make a difference in their lives. 

We don’t ask parents to act like schools. And, for their part, schools should not take on the role of parents, but rather what we must do, as educators, is to embrace each parent's belief in the potential of her or his individual child. We have to work with them to help them to discover their own personal pathways to success. Let's not use glib phrases and popular slogans to blame the learner. Let's roll up our sleeves and get to work as their "pushy" teachers.
​

All it takes is a little grit!



2 Comments
Mark Brown
2/16/2016 03:03:10 am

Wow Jim... this is as close to a rant as I've seen you write.

You are correct, of course. What I am impressed with, however, is that you remain determined that the current educational structures actually have the ability to move from "judge, jury, and executioner" to "coaches and advocates." Unfortunately, I feel the pull of cynicism when I consider that wonderful possibility.

Teachers deride the fact that students' grades are more often a function of their compliance than their true intelligence... but really, they only do this publicly. Behind closed doors we all know that the students these teachers truly want are those who have the ability to sit and listen for 6-7 hours a day in a box approximately 2 feet by 3 feet wide (the student's desk) and who can switch subjects at the chime of a bell.

But what I've found far more damning to schools and students, in my short but mildly successful career in education (my career reminds me of a firework... lots of fizzle, goes high and fast, but then what?) is that schools employ the very people who fit in to their structures. They actively pursue 'innovative' teachers to apply for positions - but when those people get to interview, or worse yet, after they come in the door to make change - the people 'in charge' realize that they ACTUALLY didn't want innovation... they wanted a glossy new clear coat on that which they've already been doing.

We've both seen all of this time and again; I'm confident that you've seen it for three times as long as I have.

Where to go from here? For me, that question is as real as it is metaphorical. But I do admire your faith that the whole of schooling and education, as it currently stands, might somehow change. A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step - perhaps, as you say, if we roll up our sleeves and take that step others will follow.

Cynical as I may be, I also still suffer from that irrational human condition called hope. It is lit by the faces of those students who "get it", not the ones who always got it, but the ones who never did before someone believed in them.

Reply
Jim
2/16/2016 10:15:25 am

Hi Mark,

I think that you are right on the money, however I wonder how much the smothering of innovation is a product of peer pressure rather than administrative inertia (or maybe a combination of the two!?). It has been my experience that school leaders often hire people who might inspire a different way of looking at things and then run for cover when their colleagues move to shut them down. Years ago I was reviewing a Toronto area school in which the Head had hired a couple of new teachers who brought experience in running classroom blogs. He wanted them to mentor the rest of the staff and get things going. Six months later he asked them to cease publishing because "it was making the other teachers look bad". As long as we let the lowest common denominator inhibit change, there is little hope for real improvement. Having said that, skilled leadership can subtly (or not so) give public support to innovators (budget, pd, recognition) that give a clear message about what is valued and appreciated.
Keep up the good fight!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    Dr. Jim Christopher is recently retired Head of Kenneth Gordon Maplewood School and Maplewood Alternative High School in North Vancouver. A parent, author and long-time teacher, and educational administrator across Canada, he has been actively involved in the drive to differentiate learning experiences to meet the needs of all learners.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    September 2019
    April 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Categories

    All
    Education
    Homework
    Independent Schools
    Learning Disabilities

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.